E. Esteve et al., A prospective study of cutaneous intolerance to topical mechlorethamine therapy in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, ARCH DERMAT, 135(11), 1999, pp. 1349-1353
Objective: To study the exact frequency and the histological features of cu
taneous intolerance to mechlorethamine (CIM) hydrochloride therapy in patie
nts with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, including Langerhans cell histiocytosi
s.
Design: A multicenter prospective study was conducted from January 1, 1994,
to May 31; 1996, in 12 different hospitals in France.
Patients: Of the 52 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas or Langerhans
cell histiocytosis, 35 were men and 17 were women, aged 18 to 87 years. Of
the 52 patients, 35 had mycosis fungoides, 8 had nonepidermotropic cutaneou
s lymphoma, 7 had lymphomatoid papulosis, 1 had Sezary syndrome, and I had
Langerhans cell histiocytosis.
Methods: Patients were treated with topical applications of a 0.02% aqueous
solution of mechlorethamine. The diagnosis of CIM was determined by the pr
esence of erythema and pruritus. Patients who developed CIM underwent close
d patch testing with three 10-fold dilutions of 0.02% mechlorethamine solut
ion. A positive patch test result was the presence of erythema and pruritus
, a weak result was the presence of simple erythema without pruritus, and a
negative result was the absence of erythema and pruritus. Skin biopsy spec
imens from patients with positive patch test results were obtained in patie
nts who developed CIM. The biopsy specimens were reviewed, and the results
determined by 2 pathologists (E.T. and J.W.). The histopathological finding
s were classified in 3 categories: (1) spongiotic dermatitis, (2) irritant
dermatitis, and (3) insignificant or normal. In September 1998, the referri
ng physicians were contacted if mechlorethamine therapy had been continued
in patients with CIM.
Results: Of the 52 patients, 43 were evaluated for tolerance to mechloretha
mine therapy. Of the 43 patients, CIM developed in 23, from 4 days to 9 mon
ths after the initiation of mechlorethamine therapy. Of those 23 patients,
CIM developed within 3 months in 21 and within 1 month in 13. Closed patch
tests were performed in 21 of the 23 patients who developed CIM. The result
s of the patch test were positive in 12, weak in 4, and negative in 5. Of t
hese 21 patients, 14 skin biopsy specimens were obtained in 14 different pa
tients who had positive or weak patch test results. The specimens showed hi
stological features that were consistent with spongiotic dermatitis in 9 pa
tients, irritant dermatitis in 2, and insignificant or normal in 3. All 9 p
atients with histological features of spongiotic dermatitis discontinued me
chlorethamine therapy. All 5 patients without histological features of spon
giotic dermatitis were able to resume mechlorethamine therapy. These result
s do not correlate with those of previous study results.
Conclusions: Mechlorethamine therapy is a cost-effective and easily adminis
tered treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Our study shows that allerg
ic dermatitis caused by mechlorethamine therapy is an early and frequent ad
verse reaction in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. The most common
histological feature of patients with CIM is spongiotic dermatitis.