Recent advances in molecular pathology and molecular genetics have created
new concerns about the use of human biologic materials in research. Since r
esearchers now have the ability to extract and amplify DNA from minuscule a
rchived samples, virtually any human tissue sample can potentially become t
he template for a test that provides information that may relate to the inh
erited genes of an individual. Researchers using human biologic materials s
hould follow the 3 basic principles that have been defined for all ethical
human subjects research: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Ins
titutional Review Boards are responsible for providing review of the risks
and benefits of research proposals to safeguard the rights and welfare of h
uman subjects. Currently, there is considerable debate concerning the role
of informed consent procedures and the Institutional Review Board oversight
process in situations when researchers use human biologic materials that h
ave been anonymized or coded. In 1999, the National Bioethics Advisory Comm
ission is expected to make recommendations to President Clinton and the Nat
ional Science and Technology Council that are expected to clarify the balan
ce between respect for personal autonomy and the societal need to pursue bi
omedical research to improve the health and welfare of all individuals.