The "Boston model" of managed care and spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study of the outcomes of risk-based, prepaid, managed care

Citation
Ar. Meyers et al., The "Boston model" of managed care and spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study of the outcomes of risk-based, prepaid, managed care, ARCH PHYS M, 80(11), 1999, pp. 1450-1456
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
00039993 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1450 - 1456
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9993(199911)80:11<1450:T"MOMC>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective: To present preliminary data on the health-related consequences f or people with spinal cord injury (SCI) of participation in a prepaid, risk -based, managed care plan. Design: Baseline data from a longitudinal interview survey. Setting: Massachusetts. Participants: Subjects were 114 independently living adults with SCJ recrui ted from 6 independent living centers and 2 managed care plans; 45 received care from a risk-based prepaid managed care plan and 69 from other sources . Main Outcomes: Self-reports of use of health services; self-assessments of health, health at interview versus 12 months earlier; hospital admissions; numbers of secondary conditions, and experiences of specific secondary cond itions (eg, pressure ulcers, depression, fatigue, and chronic pain). Results: Persons in the managed care plan do not differ from their counterp arts in terms of age, gender, education, level of SCI, number of comorbid c onditions, activity of daily living profiles, household composition, and re liance upon health maintenance programs and routines (eg, bowel and bladder care). In terms of processes of care, they appear generally better-served. There also are a few differences in outcome that are statistically signifi cant, or approach significance, and generally favor the managed care plan. Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that thoughtfully and sensitively desi gned and implemented risk-based managed care may improve both access and ou tcomes. (C) 1999 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and th e American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.