Lj. Campbell et al., Correlation of cytogenetics, BCR-ABL PCR studies and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, AUST NZ J M, 29(5), 1999, pp. 707-712
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Philadelphia positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)
accounts for 11-29% of adult ALL. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain r
eaction (RT-PCR) for the BCR-ABL fusion mRNA has identified patients with t
he fusion mRNA without cytogenetic evidence of the 9;22 translocation. The
reason for discrepancies between cytogenetic and molecular diagnoses is unc
lear.
Aim: Our aim was to study cases of ALL with discordant cytogenetic and RT-P
CR results and identify any reasons for such discrepancies.
Methods: Laboratory records were scanned for cases of ALL tested by both RT
-PCR and cytogenetics and positive by either for the 9;22 translocation. Fl
uorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was used to study discordant result
s where a specimen was available.
Results: We identified 15 patients with ALL who had both cytogenetic and RT
-PCR studies for BCR-ABL. Seven had discordant results; five patients had p
ositive RT-PCR studies with normal (four/five) or abnormal but Ph negative
cytogenetics (one/five), and two were Ph+ but RT-PCR negative. FISH, using
Vysis LSI bcr/abl translocation probes, showed fused signals in 12% interph
ase cells but not in metaphase cells in one specimen with normal cytogeneti
cs, and 6% interphase cells in the Ph negative patient with abnormal cytoge
netics. This second patient subsequently relapsed with a minor Ph+ cell lin
e derived from the Ph negative line.
Conclusions: These results confirmed the need for both cytogenetics and RT-
PCR to identify Ph+ ALL. FISH did not show sub-microscopic rearrangements o
f BCR-ABL in normal metaphases. Failure to identify the Philadelphia chromo
some cytogenetically appeared due rather to Ph+ cells failing to divide.