Comparison of ondansetron and cyclizine for prevention of nausea and vomiting after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy

Citation
Jm. Cholwill et al., Comparison of ondansetron and cyclizine for prevention of nausea and vomiting after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy, BR J ANAEST, 83(4), 1999, pp. 611-614
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
ISSN journal
00070912 → ACNP
Volume
83
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
611 - 614
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(199910)83:4<611:COOACF>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
We have compared ondansetron 4 mg i.v. and cyclizine 50 mg i.v., in a doubl e-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study for the prevention of postope rative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for 24 h after day-case gynaecological la paroscopy. Compared with placebo (n = 58), ondansetron (n = 60) and cyclizi ne (n = 57) reduced significantly the incidence of moderate or severe nause a (30% and 23% vs 52%; P = 0.02 and P = 0.001, respectively) and requiremen t for escape antiemetic (28% and 16% vs 47%; P = 0.04 and P < 0.001, respec tively) before discharge from hospital. There were no significant differenc es in PONV after discharge. Significantly more patients suffered no PONV be fore and after discharge after ondansetron and cyclizine compared with plac ebo (31% and 33% vs 12%; P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). For diagnost ic laparoscopy (n = 74), fewer patients received escape antiemetic after cy clizine than after ondansetron (4% vs 37%; P < 0.01); for laparoscopic ster ilization (n = 101), both antiemetics were equally effective. Ondansetron a nd cyclizine both reduced severe and moderate nausea and the need for antie metic therapy after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy.