Objective To determine the role of inter-observer error and the influence o
f training upon dipstick urine analysis.
Design A two phase observational and training study.
Methods Five standard solutions of serum albumin were used to test the accu
racy of midwives and nursing auxiliaries involved in dipstick urine analysi
s at a maternity hospital. The standard solutions were chosen such that the
y should have resulted in negative (n = 2) and positive (n = 3) dipstick te
st results, respectively.
Setting A teaching maternity hospital and academic department of obstetrics
and gynaecology.
Participants Twenty midwives, 20 nursing auxiliaries and nine laboratory te
chnicians.
Results For the two nonproteinuric solutions, a higher false positive rate
was observed for nursing auxiliaries (40% and 55%), compared with midwives
(5% and 30%) (P = 0.020 and P = 0.20, respectively). Before training, labor
atory technicians recorded high false positive rates (67% and 89%), but aft
er training these were reduced to 0% and 22% (P = 0.25 and P = 0.023, respe
ctively). Both nursing auxiliaries and midwives recorded false negative rat
es of between 10% and 45% for the three proteinuric solutions.
Conclusions Observer error may be reduced by assigning midwives to urine di
pstick analysis or by the implementation of directed training. Classificati
on of pre-eclampsia or other hypertensive diseases of pregnancy on the basi
s of the presence and degree of proteinuria should be confirmed with a 24-h
our quantitative protein collection.