Cr. Ries et al., Cost comparison of sevoflurane with isoflurane anesthesia in arthroscopic menisectomy surgery, CAN J ANAES, 46(11), 1999, pp. 1008-1013
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
Purpose: To determine the "real world" cost of sevoflurane compared with is
oflurane in balanced general anesthesia for daycare arthroscopic menisectom
y, we prospectively investigated perioperative drug requirement and expense
as well as recovery time.
Methods: Following intravenous induction, 40 consenting adult patients rand
omly received either sevoflurane- or isoflurane-based anesthesia with a sta
ndardized gas inflow rate of 3 1.min. Recovery was assessed in the postanes
thetic recovery room (PARR) in a double-blind manner at 15 min intervals us
ing the Aldrete scoring system until patients met discharge criteria.
Results: Patient demographics, anesthetic duration, volatile potency and ad
junct drug requirements were similar in the two groups. Total perioperative
drug cost per patient was CAN$38.10 +/- 10.13 (mean +/- SD) for the sevofl
urane group and $23.87 +/- 6.59 for the isoflurane group (P < 0.01). Althou
gh the nonvolatile drug cost was comparable between the two groups, the vol
atile drug cost per patient was $19.40 +/- 8.80 for sevoflurane and $4.50 /- 1.90 for isoflurane (P < 0.01). This four-fold sevoflurane-to-isoflurane
cost difference was the product of two ratios, both based on the volume of
liquid anesthetic: the ratio of consumption, 2.1; and the ratio of institu
tional price, 2.1. Intraoperative hemodynamic response, time until discharg
e from the PARR and incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not
significantly differ between the two groups.
Conclusions: When used to maintain equipotent balanced general anesthesia f
or daycare arthroscopic menisectomy, volatile consumption and cost were gre
ater for sevoflurane compared with isoflurane. Nonvolatile perioperative dr
ug cost and recovery times were similar, however, in the two groups.