Pj. Hendry et al., Circulatory support for cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction: A Canadian experience, CAN J CARD, 15(10), 1999, pp. 1090-1094
BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a
ssociated with high mortality. Circulatory support devices may be used to a
ssist these patients while they await cardiac transplantation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1986 to 1997, 25 patients in cardiogenic shock co
mplicating AMI within 3.6+/-0.1 days of the event were supported with artif
icial hearts. Of the 25 patients, 21 were men with a mean age of 48.4+/-1.8
years. The age range was 26 to 62 years. Patients were considered for a de
vice when the following criteria were met: cardiac index less than 1.8 L/mi
n/m(2), wedge pressure greater than 20 mmHg despite one or two inotropes an
d/or intra-aortic balloon support. They received either a CardioWest total
artificial heart (n=13), a Thoratec biventricular assist device (n=6) or le
ft ventricular assist device (LVAD) (n=6). Three patients were not consider
ed transplant candidates and died while on the devices (two with multiorgan
failure and one found to have a bronchogenic carcinoma after implant), wit
h 22 undergoing cardiac transplantation within 8.6+/-2.2 days of device imp
lant. Six patients died in hospital after the transplants (27.3% mortality)
. Complications included bleeding or tamponade in seven (28%), pneumonia in
six (24%) and right ventricular failure in three LVAD patients (12%). Post
-transplant actuarial one-, two- and five-year survival rates were 71.4%, 7
1.4% and 51%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Circulatory support devices offer a means to maintain organ pe
rfusion in patients who develop cardiogenic shock due to AMI. Patients can
then undergo transplantation with a reasonable expectation for survival whe
n the alternative is death. Eventually the availability of permanent suppor
t devices may obviate the need for transplant in these patients.