Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization overcomes pitfalls of G-banding analysis with special reference to underestimation of chromosomal aberration rates
K. Tanaka et al., Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization overcomes pitfalls of G-banding analysis with special reference to underestimation of chromosomal aberration rates, CANC GENET, 115(1), 1999, pp. 32-38
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is suitable for detecting differe
nt types of chromosome aberrations on interphase nuclei even in specimens w
ith no or few chromosome metaphases. However, it is not known why FISH is s
uperior to conventional G-banding analysis. The sensitivity of interphase F
ISH was compared to that of G-handing analysis in 288 leukemia/lymphoma pat
ients for 10 different types of chromosome aberrations: t(9;22) (M- and m-B
CR), t(8;21), 11q23 abnormalities, t(15;17), del(5)/-5, del(13)/-13, +8, -7
, and +12. The results revealed that t(15;17) positive cells could not prol
iferate well in culture, leading to underestimation of abnormality by G-ban
ding, Monosomy 7 in acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syn
drome (MDS) as well as trisomy 12 and deletion chromosome 13 in chronic lym
phocytic leukemias (CLL) were also severely underestimated by G-banding. On
the other hand, no discrepancies were observed in t(8;21), t(9;22), transl
ations involving 11q23, or in trisomy 8. These findings indicate the superi
ority of interphase FISH over conventional cytogenetics for detecting chrom
osome abnormalities in small clones, especially for monosomy 7 or (15;17) t
ranslocations. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1999. All rights reserved.