Mid-term comparative follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon pericardial prostheses

Citation
T. Le Tourneau et al., Mid-term comparative follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon pericardial prostheses, CIRCULATION, 100(19), 1999, pp. 11-16
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CIRCULATION
ISSN journal
00097322 → ACNP
Volume
100
Issue
19
Year of publication
1999
Supplement
S
Pages
11 - 16
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(19991109)100:19<11:MCFAAV>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background-The first generation of pericardial valves had a high rate of pr emature deterioration. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome aft er aortic valve replacement with second generation pericardial prostheses ( Pericarbon and Carpentier-Edwards). Methods and Results-Between 1987 and 1994, 162 patients underwent aortic va lve replacement with either a Pericarbon (n=81, 69+/-11 years) or a Carpent ier-Edwards (n=81, 70+/-11 years) pericardial prosthesis. Mean follow-up wa s 4.4+/-2.7 years for Pericarbon and 4.8+/-2.4 years for Carpentier-Edwards valves (P=0.27), giving a total follow-up of 745 patient-years. Thirty-day mortality and 5-year actuarial survival were, respectively, 6.2% and 63.2/-5.7% in the Pericarbon group and 6.2% and 63.5+5.6% in the Carpentier-Edw ards group. At 8 years, freedom from land linearized rates per patient-year ) thromboembolism, structural failure, and all valve-related events were, r espectively, 91.8+/-3.6% (1.4%), 76.9+/-8.7% (2.5%), and 58.4+/-9.3% (5.6%) in the Pericarbon group and 94.4+/-2.7% (1%), 100% (0%, P<0.01), and 88.8/-3.7% (2%, P<0.05) in the Carpentier-Edwards group. There were 9 (11.1%) P ericarbon structural failures related predominantly to severe calcification and stenosis. The actual reoperation rate was 7.4% (1.6% per patient-year) in the Pericarbon group for fibrocalcific degeneration (n=3), periprosthet ic leak (n=1), endocarditis (n=1), and aortic dissection (n=1). There was n either structural valve failure nor valve reoperation in the Carpentier-Edw ards group. Echocardiographic review of 70 patients from 85 survivors (82.3 %) found 4 additional Pericarbon valves with signs of early structural fail ure but no Carpentier-Edwards valve with such changes. Conclusions-Eight years after aortic Valve replacement, Pericarbon pericard ial prostheses compared unfavorably with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial pro stheses, with a high incidence of structural valve failure and reoperation.