The characteristics of the currently available platelet function assays (pl
atelet aggregation, serotonin release, and flow cytometry) and enzyme-linke
d immunosorbent assays that quantitate antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibo
dy titers were studied using sera collected from clinically diagnosed hepar
in-induced thrombocytopenia patients, patients without heparin-induced thro
mbocytopenia, patients with platelet immune disorders other than heparin-in
duced thrombocytopenia, and normal individuals. The platelet aggregation as
say was less sensitive than the serotonin release assay, which was less sen
sitive than the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (p < 0.001). Yet heparin-
induced thrombocytopenia was identified by platelet aggregation assay in ca
ses where the serotonin release assay and/or the enzyme-linked immunosorben
t assay were negative. Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and t
hrombosis were more often positive than heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pa
tients without thrombosis (p < 0.05). Positive platelet aggregation assay a
nd serotonin release assay results were generally associated with a higher
antibody titer; however, a minimum critical titer could not be identified.
Over a 30-day period the percentage of positive responses did not change si
gnificantly even though clinical symptoms corrected in most heparin-induced
thrombocytopenia patients. Multiple testing over several days enhanced the
chance of detecting a positive, and combined results of the three assays f
urther enhanced the positive response (p < 0.005). In patients without hepa
rin-induced thrombocytopenia, false-positive results were obtained with the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These data demonstrate that there is no
direct correlation between the positive responses of these assays, that cl
inically positive patients can be missed by all assays, and the presence of
antibody alone does not determine clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopeni
a. With these limitations, the combination of aggregation, serotonin releas
e, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing with multiple samples offe
rs the best chance of identifying a positive heparin-induced thrombocytopen
ia patient. Caution is advised for all assays as none is optimal.