M. Sideri et al., Evaluation of CO2 laser excision or vaporization for the treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, GYNECOL ONC, 75(2), 1999, pp. 277-281
Objective. Our objective was to evaluate the results of laser surgery in pa
tients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN).
Methods. From January 1990 to December 1996, 52 patients with histologicall
y proven VIN were treated with CO2 laser vaporization or laser excision. Th
e analysis included anamnestic characteristics, clinical aspects, types of
treatment, correlation of the preoperative biopsy with the excised patholog
ic specimen, and follow-up results.
Results. Fourteen women underwent laser vaporization, and 38, laser excisio
n. Of the patients submitted to vaporization, 11 were cured in one session
(75%), 1 required two procedures, and 2 other patients, who underwent more
treatments, eventually developed invasive squamous cell cancer 5 and 7 year
s from the initial treatment. The cure rate for laser excision was better,
as a single session of treatment was curative in 33 of 38 patients (87%). I
n 3 cases the pathology report on the excised specimen showed an unrecogniz
ed invasive lesion (12%) and the women underwent radical surgery. The 2 rem
aining patients, both affected by multifocal disease, experienced recurrenc
es and were treated with laser excision 2 and 3 years after the primary tre
atment, respectively. Symptom relief was obtained in all patients studied w
ith both laser vaporization and excision.
Conclusions. Excisional laser surgery is an effective treatment for patient
s with VIN. In addition, CO, laser excision allows evaluation of the operat
ive specimen and detection of occult early invasion with good preservation
of vulvar morphology; laser vaporization, while retaining good cosmetic res
ults, is less effective in VIN treatment and does not allow evaluation of t
he surgical specimen. (C) 1999 Academic Press.