M. Max et al., Effect of aerosolized prostacyclin and inhaled nitric oxide on experimental hypoxic pulmonary hypertension, INTEN CAR M, 25(10), 1999, pp. 1147-1154
Objective: To compare the effect of different concentrations of inhaled nit
ric oxide and doses of nebulized prostacyclin on hypoxia-induced pulmonary
hypertension in pigs.
Design: Prospective, controlled animal study.
Setting: Animal research facilities of an university hospital.
Interventions: After reducing the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) from 1
.0 to 0.1, two groups of five pigs each were submitted to inhalation of thr
ee concentrations of nitric oxide (5, 10 and 20 ppm) or three doses of pros
tacyclin (2.5, 5, 10 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)).
Results: All doses of prostacyclin and concentrations of nitric oxide resul
ted in a decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascula
r resistance when compared to hypoxic ventilation (p < 0.001) which was ind
ependent of the dose or concentration of either drug used. While inhalation
of nitric oxide caused a reduction in mean pulmonary arterial pressure bac
k to values obtained during ventilation with FIO2 1.0, values achieved with
prostacyclin were still significantly higher when compared to measurements
prior to the initiation of hypoxic ventilation. However, direct comparison
of the effect of 20 ppm nitric oxide and 10 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1) prostacy
clin on mean pulmonary arterial pressure revealed no differences between th
e drugs. All other hemodynamic and gas exchange parameters remained stable
throughout the study.
Conclusions: Inhalation of clinically used concentrations of nitric oxide a
nd doses of prostacyclin can decrease elevated pulmonary arterial pressure
in an animal model of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction without impairing
systemic hemodynamics or gas exchange.