F. Van Den Heuvel et al., Development and clinical implementation of an enhanced display algorithm for use in networked electronic portal imaging, INT J RAD O, 45(4), 1999, pp. 1041-1053
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To introduce and clinically validate a preprocessing algorithm tha
t allows clinical images from an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to
be displayed on any computer monitor, without loss of clinical usability.
The introduction of such a system frees EPI systems from the constraints of
fixed viewing workstations and increases mobility of the images in a depar
tment.
Methods and Materials: The preprocessing algorithm, together with its varia
ble parameters is introduced. Clinically, the algorithm is tested using an
observer study of 316 EPID images of the pelvic region in the framework of
treatment of carcinoma of the cervix and endometrium. Both anterior-posteri
or (AP/PA) and latero-lateral (LAT) images were used. The images scored wer
e taken from six different patients, five of whom were obese, female, and p
ostmenopausal. The result is tentatively compared with results from other g
roups. The scoring system, based on the number of visible landmarks in the
port, is proposed and validated. Validation was performed by having the obs
erver panel score images with artificially induced noise levels. A comparat
ive study was undertaken with a standard automatic window and leveling disp
lay technique. Finally, some case studies using different image sites and E
PI detectors are presented.
Results: The image quality for all images in this study was deemed to be cl
inically useful (mean score > 1). Most of the images received a score which
was second highest (AP/PA landmarks greater than or equal to 6 and LAT lan
dmarks greater than or equal to 5). Obesity, which has been an important fa
ctor determining the image quality, was not seen to be a factor here. Compa
red to standard techniques a highly significant improvement was determined
with regard to clinical usefulness. The algorithm performs fast (less than
9 seconds) and needs no additional user interaction in most of the cases. T
he algorithm works well on both direct detection portal imagers and camera-
based imagers whether analog or digital cameras.
Conclusions: We have demonstrated that it is possible to preprocess EPIs in
such a way that the clinically relevant landmarks are easily detected on a
generic computer screen. The algorithm is system-independent and fast. Thi
s allows for the encoding of EPIs in more generalized commercial formats so
that distribution of images is facilitated. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.