Purpose: Evidence is growing that incorrect field-shaping is a major cause
of treatment failure in whole-brain irradiation (WBI). To evaluate the pote
ntial benefits of CT simulation in WBI we compared field-shaping based on 3
D CT simulation to conventional 2D simulation
Methods: CT head scans were obtained from 20 patients. Conventional 2D plan
ning was imitated by drawing the block contours on digitally reconstructed
radiographs (DRR) by four radiotherapists. Critical parts of the target and
the eye lenses were subsequently marked and planning was repeated using 3D
information ("3D planning"). The results of both methods were compared by
evaluation of the minimal distance from the field edge according to each si
te.
Results: In conventional planning using DRR, major geographic mismatches (<
-3 mm) occurred in the subfrontal region and both eye lenses with 1% each
location. Minor mismatches (-3 to 0 mm) predominantly occurred in the contr
alateral lens (21%), ipsilateral lens (10%), and subfrontal region (9%). Cl
ose margins (0-5 mm) were most frequently noted at the contralateral lens (
49%), ipsilateral lens (35%), and the subfrontal region (28%). When 3D plan
ning was used, mismatches were not found. However, close margins were inevi
table at the ipsilateral lens (5%), subfrontal region (30%), and contralate
ral lens (70%).
Conclusions: CT simulation in WBI is significantly superior to conventional
simulation with respect to complete coverage of the target volume and prot
ection of the eye lenses. The narrow passage between the ocular lenses and
lamina cribrosa represents a serious limitation. These patients are safely
identified with CT simulation and can be referred for modified irradiation
techniques. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.