Factors associated with bone regrowth following diabetes-related partial amputation of the foot

Citation
Dg. Armstrong et al., Factors associated with bone regrowth following diabetes-related partial amputation of the foot, J BONE-AM V, 81A(11), 1999, pp. 1561-1565
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
ISSN journal
00219355 → ACNP
Volume
81A
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1561 - 1565
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9355(199911)81A:11<1561:FAWBRF>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Background: The formation of hypertrophic bone after partial resection of m etatarsal bone has the potential to cause abnormal foci of high pressure in people who have diabetes mellitus; this may increase the risk of reulcerat ion and reamputation. However, we ape not aware of previous studies evaluat ing the risk factors for this entity Methods: The records of ninety-two adults (mean age, 54 +/- 10.1 Sears; ran ge, thirty to seventy-four years) with diabetes who had had an isolated par tial amputation of a ray were abstracted. Repeat radiographs were made for all of these subjects at a mean of 22 +/- 6.1 months (range, thirteen to th irty-five months) after the initial procedure. The formation of hypertrophi c bone was defined as more than three millimeters of regrowth. Results: A total of forty-one (45 percent) of the subjects had formation of hypertrophic bone at the time of radiographic analysis after isolated part ial amputation of a ray. On multivariate analysis, the factors that mere si gnificantly associated with this regrowth of bone were male gender (88 perc ent [thirty-six] of the forty-one patients who bad bone regrowth were male compared with 51 percent [twenty-six] of the fifty-one patients who did not have bone regrowth; p < 0.01, odds ratio = 5.7, 95 percent confidence inte rval = 1.8 to 18.9), the use of manual bone-cutting instruments (used in 56 percent [twenty-three] of the forty-one patients who had bone regrowth com pared with 16 percent [eight] of the fifty-one who did not; p < 0.01, odds ratio = 4.7, 95 percent confidence interval = 1.6 to 13.8), and a resection made distal to the surgical neck of the metatarsal (used in 34 percent [fo urteen] of the forty-one patients who had bone regrowth compared with 12 pe rcent [six] of the fifty-one who did not; p < 0.03, odds ratio = 4.5, 95 pe rcent confidence interval = 1.2 to 16.9). The patients who had regrowth of bone were approximately eight times more likely to have reulceration at the site of the amputation than were those who did not have regrowth (24 perce nt [ten] of the patients with regrowth had reulceration compared,vith 4 per cent [two] of the patients without regrowth; p < 0.01, chi square = 8.4, od ds ratio = 7.9, 95 percent confidence interval = 1.6 to 38.5). Conclusions: Overgrowth of the bone of a transected metatarsal predisposes patients to ulceration. Male gender, the use of manual bone-cutting instrum ents, and metaphyseal amputation may be associated with long-term regrowth of bone following isolated partial amputation of a ray. The use of power in struments during these procedures may lead to a lower prevalence of this re action? thereby potentially reducing the risk of ulceration, infection, and reamputation.