Laparoscopic nu laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrectomy in the porcine model

Citation
Da. West et al., Laparoscopic nu laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrectomy in the porcine model, J ENDOUROL, 13(7), 1999, pp. 513-515
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
ISSN journal
08927790 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
513 - 515
Database
ISI
SICI code
0892-7790(199909)13:7<513:LNLDNI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Purpose: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is an established procedure in the porcine model. We sought to compare intraoperative variables between live l aparoscopic (LAP) and laparoscopy-assisted (LAP-A) donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: Eight domestic pigs underwent either traditional lap aroscopic donor nephrectomy (N = 4) or laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrecto my (N = 4) using the Pneumosleeve(TM) followed by conventional heterotopic autotransplantation. Results: No significant differences were noted between the groups with rega rd to vessel length, ureteral length, or postoperative urine output. The op erating room time was 108 +/- 12 minutes in the LAP group v 75.8 +/- 10.3 m inutes in the LAP-A group (P = 0,0065), Although the difference was not sta tistically significant, warm ischemic time, tended to be lower in the LAP-A than the LAP group: 70 +/- 3.0 seconds v 135 +/- 57 seconds, respectively (P = 0,059), Graft survival was identical in the two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted (via Pneumosleeve) live donor nephrectomy shortens the operative time without affecting graft survival in the domesti c swine model.