Purpose: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is an established procedure in the
porcine model. We sought to compare intraoperative variables between live l
aparoscopic (LAP) and laparoscopy-assisted (LAP-A) donor nephrectomy.
Materials and Methods: Eight domestic pigs underwent either traditional lap
aroscopic donor nephrectomy (N = 4) or laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrecto
my (N = 4) using the Pneumosleeve(TM) followed by conventional heterotopic
autotransplantation.
Results: No significant differences were noted between the groups with rega
rd to vessel length, ureteral length, or postoperative urine output. The op
erating room time was 108 +/- 12 minutes in the LAP group v 75.8 +/- 10.3 m
inutes in the LAP-A group (P = 0,0065), Although the difference was not sta
tistically significant, warm ischemic time, tended to be lower in the LAP-A
than the LAP group: 70 +/- 3.0 seconds v 135 +/- 57 seconds, respectively
(P = 0,059), Graft survival was identical in the two groups.
Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted (via Pneumosleeve) live donor nephrectomy
shortens the operative time without affecting graft survival in the domesti
c swine model.