Comparison of sponging and excising as sampling procedures for microbiological analysis of fresh beef-carcass tissue

Citation
Lm. Ware et al., Comparison of sponging and excising as sampling procedures for microbiological analysis of fresh beef-carcass tissue, J FOOD PROT, 62(11), 1999, pp. 1255-1259
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
ISSN journal
0362028X → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1255 - 1259
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-028X(199911)62:11<1255:COSAEA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Sponging and excising were evaluated as sampling procedures for microbiolog ical analysis of beef-carcass tissue. Brisket tissue portions (10 X 10 cm) were inoculated with 2 ml of an Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 cell suspension (3 X 10(8) CFU/ml). After 30 min, the portions were sampled by excising (E X) or swabbing (SP) with a sterile sponge and were analyzed for aerobic pla te counts on tryptic soy agar and for total coliform counts and E. coli cou nts on Petrifilm E. coli count plates. Another set of inoculated samples wa s analyzed after being spray washed, in sequence, with water (6 s, 35 degre es C, 3.4 bar), acetic acid (2%, 6 s, 35 degrees C, 2.1 bar), water (20 s, 42 degrees C, 20.7 bar), and acetic acid (2%, 6 s, 35 degrees C, 2.1 bar). Additional samples were sampled for analysis after chilling at 7 degrees C for 24 h. Bacterial counts recovered were influenced (P less than or equal to 0.05) by procedure of sampling (EX versus SP), time of sampling (0.5 ver sus 24 h), and by their interactions. Counts recovered 0.5 h after inoculat ion from unwashed or spray-washed samples were similar between the two samp ling procedures (EX and SP). However, counts recovered after 24 h of sample storage were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) lower for the SP compared with the EX procedure. The results indicated that as the carcass tissue was stored, recovery of bacteria by SP was less efficient than was r ecovery by EX.