Lm. Ware et al., Comparison of sponging and excising as sampling procedures for microbiological analysis of fresh beef-carcass tissue, J FOOD PROT, 62(11), 1999, pp. 1255-1259
Sponging and excising were evaluated as sampling procedures for microbiolog
ical analysis of beef-carcass tissue. Brisket tissue portions (10 X 10 cm)
were inoculated with 2 ml of an Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 cell suspension
(3 X 10(8) CFU/ml). After 30 min, the portions were sampled by excising (E
X) or swabbing (SP) with a sterile sponge and were analyzed for aerobic pla
te counts on tryptic soy agar and for total coliform counts and E. coli cou
nts on Petrifilm E. coli count plates. Another set of inoculated samples wa
s analyzed after being spray washed, in sequence, with water (6 s, 35 degre
es C, 3.4 bar), acetic acid (2%, 6 s, 35 degrees C, 2.1 bar), water (20 s,
42 degrees C, 20.7 bar), and acetic acid (2%, 6 s, 35 degrees C, 2.1 bar).
Additional samples were sampled for analysis after chilling at 7 degrees C
for 24 h. Bacterial counts recovered were influenced (P less than or equal
to 0.05) by procedure of sampling (EX versus SP), time of sampling (0.5 ver
sus 24 h), and by their interactions. Counts recovered 0.5 h after inoculat
ion from unwashed or spray-washed samples were similar between the two samp
ling procedures (EX and SP). However, counts recovered after 24 h of sample
storage were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) lower for the SP
compared with the EX procedure. The results indicated that as the carcass
tissue was stored, recovery of bacteria by SP was less efficient than was r
ecovery by EX.