Background/Aims: The primary prevention of bleeding from esophageal varices
is a major therapeutic issue requiring early screening of esophageal varic
es, Our aim was to study the diagnostic accuracy of non-endoscopic means fo
r the diagnosis of esophageal varices,
Methods: Sixty-three clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and Doppler ultrasou
nd variables were prospectively recorded in 207 consecutive patients with c
hronic liver disease. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by discriminant ana
lysis, first globally using all variables with diagnostic accuracy greater
than or equal to 65% in univariate analysis, then by stepwise regression.
Results: A) whole group (n=207), 1) diagnosis of esophageal varices: diagno
stic accuracy was globally 81%, and 81% with 1 variable: irregular liver su
rface at ultrasound, 2) Diagnosis of large esophageal varices (grades 2+3):
diagnostic accuracy was globally 80%, and 79% with 2 variables: prothrombi
n index, gamma-globulin's. B) patients with cirrhosis (n=116), 1) diagnosis
of esophageal varices: diagnostic accuracy was globally 71%, and 72% with
2 variables: platelet count, prothrombin index, 2) diagnosis of large esoph
ageal varices (grades 2+3): diagnostic accuracy was globally 71%, and 72% w
ith 3 variables: platelet count, prothrombin index, spider naevi, The ROC c
urve showed that the best threshold for the diagnostic accuracy of platelet
count was 160 Gn providing a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 58%,
Platelet count greater than or equal to 260 Gn has a negative predictive va
lue greater than or equal to 91%.
Conclusions: Using a few non-endoscopic criteria, esophageal varices can be
correctly diagnosed in 81% of patients with chronic liver disease and in 7
1% of patients with cirrhosis, These results show that the non-invasive scr
eening of patients who are candidates for the primary prevention of varicea
l bleeding is possible, but should be improved before being used in a clini
cal setting.