Objective-To analyse the performance of a large sample of Italian radiologi
sts undergoing a proficiency test for screening mammography.
Design-Evaluation of performance indicators according to reference standard
s determined by a panel of experts (sensitivity (reference standard greater
than or equal to 80%), recall rate (reference standard less than or equal
to 15%)).
Setting-117 Italian radiologists of varying experience (years of practice 0
.5-18, average 5.9; mammograms read 500-51 000, average 13 000), all curren
tly reporting clinical mammography and planning to take part in screening i
n the near future.
Results-Eighty four of 117 (72%) radiologists reached the standard for sens
itivity, 88 (75%) reached the standard for recall rate, and only 59 (50%) r
eached both standards and passed the proficiency test. The probability of p
assing the test was significantly correlated with mammographic practice (p=
0.015), mammograms read (p=0.024), and mammograms read/year (p=0.043).
Discussion-The performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists curren
tly reporting clinical mammography was disappointing, indicating the need f
or proper training of at least 50% of the tested subjects. When implementin
g organised screening the health authority should set up a proper process f
ar training and accrediting radiologists, and a proficiency test should be
part of such a process.