Compressive failure mechanisms in composite sandwich structures

Citation
Mk. Cvitkovich et Wc. Jackson, Compressive failure mechanisms in composite sandwich structures, J AMER HELI, 44(4), 1999, pp. 260-268
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Aereospace Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00028711 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
260 - 268
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8711(199910)44:4<260:CFMICS>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The objective of this work was to investigate the compressive failure respo nse of composite sandwich structures of four different configurations desig ned to produce different failure modes. Specimens were tested with no damag e, with 0.25-inch-diameter open holes, and with three levels of impact dama ge. The facesheets consisted of two, three, or four layers of carbon/epoxy plain-weave fabric. Nomex and aluminum honeycomb were used as core material s, Strain gages were used to monitor the in-plane strain distribution aroun d the damaged area. Out of-plane displacements were recorded using shadow m oire interferometry to monitor initial signs of facesheet instability. Afte r compression testing, representative specimens were sectioned to document the internal damage. The influence of damage state was documented for each specimen configuration. For Nomex-core specimens, the effects of facesheet thickness on strength and strains were investigated. The effect of core mat erial was studied for the four-layer facesheet specimens. Strain distributi ons around the damage and the load carried by the damaged region were exami ned as a function of applied stress level. Depending on core material and d amage type, different responses were identified. Two distinct compressive f ailure mechanisms, inward and outward buckling of the impacted facesheet, w ere identified that were functions of facesheet thickness and damage type, The experimental observations of these failure mechanisms were related to c urrent damage tolerance analysis methodologies. Wrinkling analysis appeared to model the correct undamaged failure mechanisms but needs to be improved to more accurately predict the influence of facesheet thickness and core m aterials on strength. For open holes, the point stress/strain and average s tress/strain criteria may not be appropriate as they are not sensitive to f acesheet thickness or core stiffness. Modeling impact damage as an initial facesheet indentation on a damaged core appeared to be a suitable analysis for the inward-type buckling failure mechanism.