Background: Blunt carotid arterial injuries (BCI) have the potential for de
vastating outcomes. A paucity of literature and the absence of a formal BCI
grading scale have been major impediments to the formulation of sound prac
tice guidelines, We reviewed our experience with 109 BCI and developed a gr
ading scale with prognostic and therapeutic implications,
Methods: Patients admitted to a Level I trauma center were evaluated with c
erebral arteriography if they exhibited signs or symptoms of BCI or met cri
teria for screening. Patients with BCI were treated with heparin unless the
y had contraindications, and follow-up arteriography was performed at 7 to
10 days, Endovascular stents were deployed selectively, A prospective datab
ase was used to track the patients.
Results: A total of 76 patients were diagnosed with 109 BCI, Two-thirds of
mild intimal injuries (grade I) healed, regardless of therapy. Dissections
or hematomas with luminal stenosis (grade II) progressed, despite heparin t
herapy in 70% of cases. Only 8% of pseudoaneurysms (grade III) healed with
heparin, but 89% resolved after endovascular stent placement. Occlusions (g
rade IV) did not recanalize in the early postinjury period, Grade V injurie
s (transections) were lethal and refractory to intervention. Stroke risk in
creased with injury grade. Severe head injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale score l
ess than or equal to 6) were found in 46% of patients and confounded evalua
tion of neurologic outcomes.
Conclusion: This BCI grading scale has prognostic and therapeutic implicati
ons. Nonoperative treatment options for grade I BCI should be evaluated in
prospective, randomized trials, Accessible grade II, III, IV, and V lesions
should be surgically repaired. Inaccessible grade II, III, and IV injuries
should be treated with systemic anticoagulation, Endovascular techniques m
ay be the only recourse in high grade V injuries and warrant controlled eva
luation in the treatment of grade III BCI.