Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison between respiratory-triggered turbo spin echo and breath hold single-shot turbo spin echo sequences

Citation
N. Papanikolaou et al., Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison between respiratory-triggered turbo spin echo and breath hold single-shot turbo spin echo sequences, MAGN RES IM, 17(9), 1999, pp. 1255-1260
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
ISSN journal
0730725X → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1255 - 1260
Database
ISI
SICI code
0730-725X(199911)17:9<1255:MRCCBR>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the relative conspicuity of the pa ncreaticobiliary tree on respiratory-triggered three-dimensional turbo spin echo (3D TSE RT) and breath hold single-shot turbo spin echo (SSTSE BH) ac quisitions respectively in MRCP imaging. Both techniques were applied to 61 patients with clinically suspected pancreaticobiliary disease using a 1.0 T MR system. All images were reviewed blindly, Qualitative comparison was m ade by grading subjectively the conspicuity of extrahepatic, intrahepatic, and main pancreatic ducts. Quantitative comparison included calculations of signal-to-noise ratio of the common bile duct, main pancreatic duct, gallb ladder, liver, and contrast-to-noise ratio, relative contrast between commo n bile duct, gallbladder, and liver. 3D TSE RT provided significantly highe r signal-to-noise ratio of the common bile duct (mean value 163.19) and mai n pancreatic duct (mean value 95.37) compared to SSTSE BH (mean values 76.2 4 and 26.22, respectively). 3D TSE RT was inferior to SSTSE BH for the depi ction of intrahepatic ducts and pancreatic duct (head portion). 3D TSE RT a nd SSTSE BH sequences provide complimentary information in the visualizatio n of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Further comparative clinical studies are needed to redefine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRCP using both sequences. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.