U. Niinemets, Components of leaf dry mass per area - thickness and density - alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants, NEW PHYTOL, 144(1), 1999, pp. 35-47
The relationships of foliage assimilation capacity per unit area (P-max(P))
with leaf dry mass per unit area (LMA) and nitrogen content per unit area
(N-P) differ between species and within species grown in different habitats
. To gain a more mechanistic insight into the dependencies of P-max(p) on L
MA and N-P, this literature study based on 597 species from a wide range of
earth biomes with woody vegetation examines the relations between leaf pho
tosynthetic capacity and the components of LMA (leaf density (D, dry mass p
er volume) and thickness (T)), and also the correlations of D and T with le
af nitrogen content and fractional leaf volumes in different tissues. Acros
s all species, P-max(P) varied 12-fold and photosynthetic capacity per unit
dry mass (P-max(m)) 16-fold, N-P 12-fold, and nitrogen per unit dry mass (
N-m) 13-fold, LMA 16-fold, D 13-fold, and T 35-fold, indicating that foliar
morphology was more plastic than foliar chemistry and assimilation rates.
Although there were strong positive correlations between P-max(P) and N-P,
and between P-max(m) and N-m, leaf structure was a more important determina
nt of leaf assimilation capacities. P-max(P) increased with increasing LMA
and T, but was independent of D. By contrast, P-max(m) scaled negatively wi
th LMA because of a negative correlation between P-max(m) and D, and was po
orly related to T. Analysis of leaf nitrogen and tissue composition data in
dicated that the negative relationship between D and P-max(m) resulted from
negative correlations between D and N-m, D and volumetric fraction of leaf
internal air space, and D and symplasmic leaf fraction. Thus, increases in
leaf density bring about (1) decreases in assimilative leaf compounds, and
(2) extensive modifications in leaf anatomy that may result in increases i
n intercellular transfer resistance to CO,. Collectively, (1) and (2) lead
to decreased P-max(m), and also modify P-max(p) versus LMA relationships.