Sow accommodation systems were assessed at 76 farms in New Zealand during 1
998. The sample was representative of the sampling frame which comprised ar
ound 90% of the sow population in the country. During the farrowing to wean
ing period, 67, 10, and 23% of the sows were held in indoor farrowing crate
s, indoor pens, and outdoor arks, respectively. During the pregnancy period
, 32, 40, and 28% of the sows were in dry sow stalls, indoor pens, and outd
oor paddocks, respectively. The most common combinations were farrowing in
arks followed by holding in dry sow paddocks (25% of the farms, 23% of the
sows), farrowing indoors in crates followed by dry sow pens (26% of the far
ms, 35% of the sows), and farrowing indoors in crates followed by dry sow s
talls (25% of the farms, 29% of the sows). From an animal welfare perspecti
ve, New Zealand is in a favourable position because it has well established
outdoor and group pen sow accommodation systems.