Rm. Balen et al., Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes - A Canadian hospital perspective, PHARMACOECO, 16(5), 1999, pp. 533-542
Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness of enoxaparin therapy versus
unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy for patients with unstable coronary a
rtery disease from the perspective of a Canadian hospital.
Design: A predictive decision analysis model using published clinical and e
conomic evaluations and casts of medical care in Canada.
Patients: A hypothetical cohort of patients presenting to hospital with uns
table angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction as defined by the Efficacy
and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSEN
CE) trial.
Interventions: Two antithrombotic treatment strategies were compared: (i) e
noxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, and (ii) UFH intravenous b
olus and constant infusion adjusted to maintain a therapeutic activated par
tial thromboplastin time. Both treatment strategies included 100 to 325 mg
of oral aspirin daily. Enoxaparin or UFH was continued for a minimum of 48
hours to a maximum of 8 days. Cumulative outcomes were considered up to 30
days after initial presentation to hospital.
Results: At 30 days, 19.8% of patients who received enoxaparin compared wit
h 23.3% of patients who received UFH reached one of the primary composite e
vents. There was no difference in major bleeding between the 2 treatment gr
oups (6.5% enoxaparin vs 6.8% UFH). The average total direct medical cost p
er patient was $Can848 with the enoxaparin strategy versus $Can892 with the
UFH strategy (1999 values). Therapy with enoxaparin was, therefore, consid
ered to be the dominant strategy. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated
that the decision model was not robust to changes in the 30-day composite
end-point, probability of recurrent angina, or base casts for treatment of
recurrent angina or enoxaparin therapy.
Conclusion: Enoxaparin is the dominant antithrombotic pharmacotherapeutic s
trategy for patients with unstable coronary artery disease.