Dj. Walters et al., Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections, PHARMACOECO, 16(5), 1999, pp. 551-561
Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of sequential intravenous (TV)
to oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (CIP/MTZ IV/PO) with that of IV c
iprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole (CIP/MTZ IV) and IV imipenem-cilastatin
(IMI IV) in patients with intra-abdominal infections.
Design and participants: Patients enrolled in a double-blind randomised cli
nical trial were eligible for inclusion into this cost-effectiveness analys
is, Decision analysis was used to characterise the economic outcomes betwee
n groups and provide a structure upon which to base the sensitivity analyse
s. 1996 cost values were used throughout.
Setting: The economic perspective of the analysis was that of a hospital pr
ovider.
Main outcome measures and results: Among 446 economically evaluable patient
s, 176 could be switched from IV to oral administration. The 51 patients ra
ndomised to CIP/MTZ IV/PO who received active oral therapy had a success ra
te of 98%, mean duration of therapy of 9.1 days and mean cost of $US7678. T
here were 125 patients randomised to either CIP/MTZ IV or IMI IV who receiv
ed oral placebo while continuing on active IV antibacterials; their success
rate was 94%, mean duration of therapy was 10.1 days and mean cost was $US
8774_ (p = 0.029 vs CIP/MTZ IV/PO). Of the 270 patients who were unable to
receive oral administration, 97 received IMI IV and had a success rate of 7
5%, mean duration of therapy of 13.8 days and a mean cost of $US 12 418, an
d 173 received CIP/MTZ IV and had a success rate of 77%, mean duration of t
herapy of 13.4 days and mean cast of $US 12 219 (p = 0.26 vs IMI IV).
Conclusions: In patients able to receive oral therapy, sequential IV to ora
l treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was cost effective compar
ed with full IV courses of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole or imipenem-cil
astatin. In patients unable to receive oral therapy, no difference in mean
cost was found between IV imipenem-cilastatin or IV ciprofloxacin plus IV m
etronidazole.