J. Greilhuber et R. Obermayer, Cryptopolyploidy in Bunias (Brassicaceae) revisited - A flow-cytometric and densitometric study, PLANT SYS E, 218(1-2), 1999, pp. 1-4
The concern of the present analysis is the hypothetical 'cryptopolyploidy',
a concept basically of historical interest only, but discussed again by Ba
ttaglia (1996) in a recent treatment of the term and its historical backgro
und. Melinossi (1935), while reanalyzing erratic observations on the crucif
ers Bunias erucago and B. orientalis by Jaretzky (1928a), found 2n = 14 in
both species but twice the chromosome volume in B. erucago compared with B.
orientalis. Melinossi considered 'cryptopolyploidy' in B. erucago, i.e., s
he discussed pairwise fused chromosomes on a tetraploid basis or endoredupl
icated (and thus binemic) chromosomes in this species. Cryptopolyploidy has
also been claimed by Pannocchia-Laj (1938) in Vinca difformis (Vincaceae).
Battaglia (1996) criticized the term 'cryptopolyploidy' because, in his op
inion, the genuinely polyploid status of these plants is not hidden ('crypt
o') but phenotypically (from herbarium specimens) recognizable. He coins th
e term 'phenopolyploidy', i.e., "phenotypic polyploidy disagreeing with the
karyotype numerically evalated". We measured genome size of B. orientalis
and B. erucago (both 2n = 14) by Feulgen densitometry and propidium iodide
flow cytometry. Surprisingly, B. erucago (the annual species with 2.13 pg,
1 C) turned out to have only 0.81-fold the DNA amount of B. orientalis (the
perennial species with 2.64 pg, 1 C). Therefore, any kind of genetically p
olyploid status in B. erucago is out of the question. Only speculative sign
ificance can be ascribed to the terms 'cryptopolyploidy' and 'phenopolyploi
dy'.