Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening

Citation
Rm. Saywell et al., Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening, PREV MED, 29(5), 1999, pp. 374-382
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00917435 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
374 - 382
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7435(199911)29:5<374:CCOFIT>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background Mammography is the primary method used for breast cancer screeni ng. However, compliance with recommended screening practices is still below acceptable levels. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of five comb inations of physician recommendation and telephone or in-person individuali zed counseling strategies for increasing compliance with mammography. Methods. There were 808 participants who were randomly assigned to one of s ix groups. A logistic regression model with compliance as the dependent var iable and group as the independent variable was used to test for significan t differences and a ratio of cost to improvement in mammogram compliance ev aluated the cost-effectiveness. Results. Three of the interventions tin-person, telephone plus letter, and in-person plus letter) had significantly better compliance rates compared w ith the control, physician letter, or telephone alone. However, when consid ering costs, only one emerged as the superior strategy. The cost-effectiven ess ratios for the five interventions show that telephone-plus-letter is th e most cost-effective strategy, achieving a 35.6% mammography compliance at a marginal cost of $0.78 per 1% increase in women screened. Conclusions. A tailored phone prompt and physician reminder is an effective and economical intervention to increase mammography. Future research shoul d confirm this finding and address its applicability to practice. (C) 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.