It is widely agreed that Mesozoic rocks formerly were present over much of
northern England, well beyond the erosional limits of their present-day out
crops to the east and west of the Lake District and the Pennines. However,
the extent, age, lithology, sequence and thickness of these vanished rocks
have proved to be a controversial subject. The principal methods employed t
o determine the burial and thermal history of the region, and to estimate t
he thickness and nature of the eroded rocks, are (1) extrapolation of strat
igraphical information from the preserved strata, (2) variations in rock ph
ysical properties with depth in boreholes and (3) depth conversion of palae
otemperature measurements and estimates from apatite fission track analysis
, diagenetic mineral assemblages and alteration of organic matter. The expl
oration for oil and gas in the region and adjacent offshore areas provided
a spur to such investigations. All the methods used are, to a greater or le
sser extent, dependent on unverifiable assumptions. The results obtained ha
ve been somewhat contradictory, with estimates of the thickness of eroded M
esozoic overburden in the Northern Pennines, the Lake District and the Clev
eland Hills ranging from a few hundred metres to more than 3000 m.
Early modelling studies of the palaeotemperature data, derived from apatite
fission track analysis on samples from the Lake District and some adjacent
parts of the Northern Pennines, have suggested that the minimum thickness
of Mesozoic rocks over much of this area was in excess of 3000 m. However,
a more recent investigation which took into account the locally high heat f
lows in this area. and made use of more refined methods of converting palae
otemperatures to palaeodepths, indicates an eroded overburden thickness of
only c. 1500 m, a value consistent with regional stratigraphical informatio
n and some sonic log studies.
The depth conversion of some palaeotemperature data from the East Midlands
Shelf and the Cleveland Basin, where heat flow is somewhat lower than in th
e Lake District, is reassessed. Several modelling options have been conside
red. The palaeotemperature data are consistent with the removal of c. 2500
m of post-Middle Jurassic overburden from the central parts of the inverted
Cleveland Basin. Similar conclusions have been reached from several sonic
log studies. Regional stratigraphical trends suggest that it is unlikely th
at all of these eroded rocks were of Mesozoic (Upper Jurassic and Cretaceou
s) age, and it seems more probable that up to c. 1000 m were of Early Cenoz
oic age. Modelling of palaeotemperature data, combined with regional strati
graphical information and sonic log compaction studies, suggest that the ma
ximum thickness of Chalk on the East Midlands Shelf, before erosion, was c.
700 m. The modelling is unable to discriminate between alternative explana
tions for the inferred thicknesses of missing strata from the East Midlands
Shelf (Cleethorpes and Biscathorpe boreholes): either (1) the missing rock
s were all Late Cretaceous Chalk, or (2! the missing rocks were mainly Chal
k, partially eroded in end-Cretaceous/Early Cenozoic times, and overlain by
a few tens of metres of Early Cenozoic strata.