Studies on working memory have shown differences between good and poor read
ers using composed measures which involve storage and processing, as the re
ading span test. On the other hand using simple measures of working memory
like the digit span test, usually no differences can be found. In our resea
rch we have studied the relationship between working memory and reading abi
lity in a sample of 38 children of 6 and 7 years. Two simple measures of wo
rking memory (digit span and word span tests) and two composed measures (se
ntence + word span and addition + digit span) were used. The results indica
te that on initial stages of learning to read, simple measures of working m
emory differenciate skilled and poor readers are as good as complex measure
s, or even more. We conclude that simple measures of working memory can be
also an appropriate way of predicting difficulties in the process of acquis
ition of reading skills.