Pr. Finn et al., Working memory, executive processes and the effects of alcohol on Go/No-Golearning: testing a model of behavioral regulation and impulsivity, PSYCHOPHAR, 146(4), 1999, pp. 465-472
Rationale: Impulsivity is associated with increased risk for alcoholism. Al
cohol also may increase impulsive behavior, although little is known about
the processes underlying this effect. Objectives: This study tested a model
proposing that the executive processes of working memory (WM) and conditio
nal associative learning (CAL) modulate behavioral inhibition. Subjects had
either a positive (FHP) or a negative (FHN) family history of alcoholism.
Hypotheses were that alcohol would increase Go/No-Go impulsive responding b
ut only in subjects with low working memory capacity (low-WM), low-GAL abil
ity, or FHP for alcoholism. The model also predicted that WM and CAL modula
te inhibitory responses to contingency reversal on a Go/No-Go task. Methods
: A Go/No-Go learning task with a midway contingency reversal was administe
red to 71 FHP and 78 FHN subjects when sober and after drinking one of two
moderate doses of alcohol. WM (digits backward) and CAL (conditional spatia
l association task) were also assessed when sober. Results: Alcohol resulte
d in more false alarms but only in low-WM subjects. Both WM and CAL modulat
ed learning to inhibit behavior after contingency reversal, suggesting sepa
rate modulation mechanisms for WM and GAL. Subjects with low-capacity WM an
d subjects with low-capacity CAL ability had more difficulty learning respo
nse inhibition after contingency reversal. FHPs and FHNs did not differ in
their response to alcohol. Conclusions: The results support our model of th
e modulatory role of WM and CAL in the ongoing regulation of behavioral inh
ibitory systems. The results also suggest that individuals with low capacit
y WM are more susceptible to alcohol's effect of increasing impulsive behav
ior, suggesting that alcohol reduces the capacity of working memory to modu
late response inhibition.