Background: Caring for cancer patients is expensive, warranting verificatio
n that health care organization works in a satisfactory way. A first step o
f this evaluation deals with the description of the pathway followed in the
health care system by the patient.
Methods: 671 breast cancer cases were diagnosed in Isere in 1995. According
to the place where each treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) wa
s performed we described pathways for the patient, either entirely private,
public or mixed. Characteristics of the patient (age, place of residence),
of the disease (extent of disease, way of discovery) and of the physician
(general practitioner specialist) might have influenced the choice of this
pathway. We described and tested the distribution of these characteristics
within the 3 groups using univariate analysis. Relative risk of being affec
ted to the private pathway compared to the public one was computed, after a
djusting for age, type of physician, extent of disease, way of discovery an
d sanitary area, using a multivariate analysis (logistic regression).
Results: In the department of Isere, the private pathway cared for 55% of b
reast cancers, the public one 23% and the mixed one 19%. There was no prefe
rential recruitment according to age, physician type, presence of metastasi
s or of the rural or urban residence. In sanitary area number 5, characteri
zed by an important attraction of the patients by the nearby department of
Rhone, 41% of the patients were cared for the private pathway, compared to
63% in sanitary area 4, where most patients were treated in the main town o
f Isere: Grenoble. After early breast cancer detection with mammography ins
tead of breast cancer screening, probability of being cared for in the priv
ate pathway was 2-fold higher (OR=2) than in the public one.
Conclusion: In Isere department early breast cancer defection with mammogra
phy is in favor of the private pathway. This is not true for physician type
, neither for characteristics of the patient or extent of the disease. Fina
lly, the distance to next department of oncology or radiotherapy plays a ma
jor role.