Acute toxicity of postoperative radiochemotherapy with amifostine vs radiochemotherapy alone in head and neck cancer patients. Preliminary results ofa randomized trial
P. Vacha et al., Acute toxicity of postoperative radiochemotherapy with amifostine vs radiochemotherapy alone in head and neck cancer patients. Preliminary results ofa randomized trial, STRAH ONKOL, 175, 1999, pp. 18-22
Purpose: Experimental and clincial data suggest a reduction of radiation-in
duced acute toxicity by amifostine. We investigated this issue in a randomi
zed trial comparing radiochemotherapy (RCT) versus radiochemotherapy and am
ifostine (RCT + A) in patients with head and neck cancer.
Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients with pharyngeal or laryngeal can
cer (T1-2 N1-2 G(3), T3-4 N0-2 G(1-3)) were randomized to receive RCT alone
(21 patients) or RCT + A (21 patients). Patients were irradiated up to 60
Gy (R-0) or 70 Gy (R-1/2). Chemotherapy consisted of 70 mg/m(2) carboplatin
and was administered over 5 days in the 1st and 5th week of the radiothera
py course. 250 mg amifostine were applied daily just before each radiothera
py session. Acute toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity C
riteria (CTC). As for xerostomia no patients with laryngeal cancer were ass
essed because in these cases only small volumes of the salivary glands were
within the treatment volume. To evaluate the overall toxicity a summarized
CTC score of all observed side effects was calculated.
Results: Forty-two patients were evaluable. Clinical characteristics (age,
sex, Karnofsky index, tumor-staging) were well balanced in both treatment g
roups (Tables 2 and 3). Amifostine provided reduction in xerostomia and muc
ositis (Figures 5 and 6) but had no obvious influence on Karnofsky index, b
ody weight, cutaneous side effects and alopezia (Figures 1 to 4).
Conclusions: According to our preliminary results amifostine has a radiopro
tective effect on salivary glands. Mucositis can be reduced during radioche
motherapy. At this point of patient accrual the difference between both gro
ups are statistically not significant. To improve the radioprotective effec
ts of amifostine in clinical practice the application of a higher dose (> 2
50 mg) seems to be necessary.