Objectives. To review a large experience with sperm cryopreservation in pat
ients with testicular cancer and determine the effect of clinical stage and
tumor histologic features on semen quality.
Methods. The prefreeze and post-thaw sperm quality of 157 patients with tes
ticular cancer was compared with that of 50 normal donors. The impact of tu
mor stage and histologic features (pure seminoma, pure embryonal, or mixed
germ cell) was also determined. A computer-assisted semen analysis was perf
ormed before and after cryopreservation. The motile sperm count (MSC), moti
lity, and motion characteristics were measured before and after cryopreserv
ation and compared between groups.
Results. Patients with testicular cancer had lower prefreeze and post-thaw
MSC and motility compared with normal donors (P = 0.0001 for both). The cur
vilinear velocity and linearity were also significantly less in patients wi
th testicular cancer (P <0.05 for both). The percentage of change in the se
men characteristics did not differ between patients and donors, indicating
that sperm from both patients and donors withstood the cryopreservation pro
cess equally well. Tumor stage (n = 143) and histologic features (n = 136)
did not significantly influence semen quality. No individual histologic com
ponent significantly influenced MSC or motility.
Conclusions, The effect of cryopreservation on sperm was similar in patient
s with testicular cancer and donors. Patients with poor prefreeze semen qua
lity have poor post-thaw semen quality, and the effects of cryopreservation
were not significantly affected by histologic features or stage. Our resul
ts indicate that routine sperm banking should be recommended for men with a
diagnosis of testicular cancer to preserve future fertility potential. URO
LOGY 54: 894-899, 1999. (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc.