The aim of this study was to determine the motivation of patients (n = 73)
who had undergone microsurgical refertilization for further treatment (assi
sted reproduction) and the demand for medical counseling. By an interview,
57/73 patients could be evaluated for motivation, further demand for medica
l counseling, and the postoperative outcome (patency rate). In all, 60% of
the patients who failed the treatment and 33% with a patent anastomosis men
tioned interest for further counseling, especially for assisted reproductio
n. The satisfaction rate after the refertilization was nearly identical in
the two groups (67%/64%). Following microscopical vasovasostomies the paten
cy was 92%, which was significantly different from that observed after macr
oscopical refertilization (55%). In conclusion, the standard for refertiliz
ation is the microsurgical technique. Furthermore, there is a strong need f
or counseling that involves urological-andrological advice given by the sam
e work group, including advisement on the techniques of assisted reproducti
on that might be necessary following the operative treatment.