G. Ross et al., IV topotecan (TOPT) in patients (Pts) who relapse following platinum(P)/paclitaxel(TX) treatment: subset analysis of a phase III trial, 7TH BIENNIAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL GYNECOLOGIC CANCER SOCIETY, 1999, pp. 285-289
A comparison of oral and IV topotecan (TOPT) was made using a randomised ph
ase III study. From this study, a subset of patients were taken from the IV
arm of the study, who had failed first line treatment with platinum and pa
clitaxel as combination therapy (TX/P). This subset was compared to those o
ther IV patients who had received first line therapy with a regimen other t
han platinum with paclitaxel (non-TX/P). Demographically there were no subs
tantial differences between the populations being compared. Those patients
who had received TX/P as first line therapy had a response rate at least as
good (22.2%) as those patients who had received non-TX/P (18.2%), and tole
rability was comparable. Therefore single agent TOPT 1.5mg/m(2) daily shoul
d be considered as second line treatment for patients who had failed TX/P(t
he accepted standard).