Macrolevel theory and local-level inequality: Industrial structure, institutional arrangements, and the political economy of redistribution, 1970 and1990

Citation
L. Lobao et al., Macrolevel theory and local-level inequality: Industrial structure, institutional arrangements, and the political economy of redistribution, 1970 and1990, ANN AS AM G, 89(4), 1999, pp. 571-601
Citations number
84
Categorie Soggetti
EnvirnmentalStudies Geografy & Development
Journal title
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS
ISSN journal
00045608 → ACNP
Volume
89
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
571 - 601
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-5608(199912)89:4<571:MTALII>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
This study assesses the explanatory power of macrolevel political economy t heory for redistribution across local areas. We focus on contentions about the role of industrial structure and institutional arrangements in income g rowth and inequality in two periods, 1970 and 1990. Specific hypotheses are derived from the Social Structures of Accumulation approach. These include (1) that redistribution processes have shifted, with manufacturing employm ent and institutional arrangements between capital labor and state citizens less able to generate local growth and reduce income inequality than in th e past, and (2) that effects of manufacturing employment on inequality are partly contingent on local institutional context. These hypotheses are test ed for U.S. counties using regression models that conceptualize geographic processes through spatial diffusion effects and nesting of counties within states. Results support most baseline, 1970 relationships suggested by theo ry. Other findings run counter to political economy claims. They do not sup port assumptions that progressive institutional arrangements and leading ma nufacturing industries worked in tandem to reduce inequality. Relationships between inequality and manufacturing employment remain similar in 1970 and 1990, but there is some evidence that the role of institutional arrangemen ts in redistribution may be shifting. On balance, however, local patterns o f inequality and their social determinants have changed little despite two decades of Fordist restructuring. The results provide local-level evidence challenging widely held assumptions about a profound break in redistributio n relationships relative to the past. They indicate the need to investigate inertia as a social process.