Quality of care for primary care patients with depression in managed care

Citation
Kb. Wells et al., Quality of care for primary care patients with depression in managed care, ARCH FAM M, 8(6), 1999, pp. 529-536
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10633987 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
529 - 536
Database
ISI
SICI code
1063-3987(199911/12)8:6<529:QOCFPC>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the process and quality of care for primary care pat ients with depression under managed care organizations. Method: Surveys of 1204 outpatients with depression at the time of and afte r a visit to 1 of 181 primary care clinicians from 46 primary care clinics in 7 managed care organizations. Patients had depressive symptoms in the pr evious 30 days, with or without a 12-month depressive disorder by diagnosti c interview. Process indicators were depression counseling, mental health r eferral, or psychotropic medication management at index visit and the use o f appropriate antidepressant medication during the last 6 months. Results: Of patients with depressive disorder and recent symptoms, 29% to 4 3% reported a depression-specific process of care in the index visit, and 3 5% to 42% used antidepressant medication in appropriate dosages in the prio r 6 months. Patients with depressive disorders rather than symptoms only an d those with comorbid anxiety had higher rates of depression-specific proce sses and quality of care (P<.005). Recurrent depression, suicidal ideation, and alcohol abuse were not uniquely associated with such rates. Patients v isiting for old problems or checkups received more depression-specific care than those with new problems or unscheduled visits. The 7 managed care org anizations varied by a factor of 2-fold in rates of depression counseling a nd appropriate antidepressant use. Conclusions: Rates of process and quality of care for depression as reporte d by patients are moderate to low in managed primary care practices. Such r ates are higher for patients with more severe forms of depression or with c omorbid anxiety, but not for those with severe but "silent" symptoms like s uicide ideation. Visit context factors, such as whether the visit is schedu led, affect rates of depression-specific care. Rates of care for depression are highly variable among managed care organizations, emphasizing the need for process monitoring and quality improvement for depression at the organ izational level.