Constraints of age, distance and progenitor of the supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622/GRO J0852-4642

Citation
B. Aschenbach et al., Constraints of age, distance and progenitor of the supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622/GRO J0852-4642, ASTRON ASTR, 350(3), 1999, pp. 997-1006
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
ISSN journal
00046361 → ACNP
Volume
350
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
997 - 1006
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-6361(199910)350:3<997:COADAP>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The discovery of the nearest young supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622 / GRO J0852-4642 in the Galaxy by ROSAT and COMPTEL has been reported recently Ag e and distance are determined to similar to 680 years and similar to 200 pc by the Xray diameter and the gamma-ray line flux of radioactive Ti-44. Her e we discuss the implications of the X-ray spectra and of the fact that 1.8 MeV gamma-ray line emission from the decay of Al-26 has been measured from the Vela region with a certain fraction possibly associated with the new S NR. We estimate an uncertainty of the age of +/- 100 yrs for a fixed yield of Ti-44. The highest values of Ti-44 yield provided by current supernova e xplosion models give worst case upper limits of 1100 yrs for the age and of 500 pc for the distance. Also the unknown ionization stage of Ti-44 adds t o the uncertainty of age and distance which is at most another 35% on top. Both the energy balance compiled for the remnant and yield predictions for Ti-44 and Al-26 by supernova models favour a core-collapse event. Two point sources have been found in the vicinity of the explosion center, either on e of these might be the neutron star left by the supernova. If there is a n eutron star the X-ray count rates of the two point sources provide an upper limit of the blackbody surface temperature, which is very unlikely to exce ed 3x10(5) K. The supernova might have been observed some 700 +/- 150 yrs a go, but based on the data of SN 1181, e.g., there is a realistic chance tha t it has been missed if the supernova was sub-luminous.