Objective To conduct a systematic review of the Literature on the longevity
of routine dental restorations in permanent posterior teeth, and to identi
fy and examine factors influencing its variability.
Method Accepted guidelines were followed. An advisory group oversaw the pro
ject. Simple Class I and Class II amalgam, composite resin, glass ionomer a
nd cast gold restorations were covered. Comprehensive searching of electron
ic databases, hand-searching, and location of 'grey' Literature, generated
124 research reports. Those considered relevant were assessed for validity
and quality according to agreed criteria. The analysis was descriptive.
Results Eight of 58 relevant research reports were categorised, according t
o agreed criteria, as being of satisfactory validity and quality. They sugg
ested that 50% of all restorations last 10 to 20 years, although both highe
r and lower median survival, times were reported. The findings were support
ed by the totality of studies reviewed. However, variability was substantia
l. Restoration type, materials, the patient, the operator, the practice env
ironment and type of care system appeared to influence longevity.
Conclusions Many studies were imperfect in design. Those considered to be t
he most appropriate for analysis were too limited to undertake a formal sta
tistical exploration. Therefore there remains a need for definitive randomi
sed controlled trials of restoration longevity, of sound design and adequat
e power, employing standardised assessments and appropriate methods of anal
ysis.