The objective of this paper is to propose an evaluation framework for short
courses in continuing education for general dental practitioners (GDPs) (s
o called, Section 63 courses). Existing monitoring and evaluation procedure
s in the West Midlands deanery were examined and an improved evaluation fra
mework was then devised, piloted and revised. A 5 phase method was used inc
orporating the examination of existing practice (Phases 1 and 2), developme
nt of a new framework (Phase 3), piloting (Phase 4) and revision of the eva
luation framework in the light of the pile,. This approach will be implemen
ted in the West Midlands and may be adapted for national use (Phase 5). It
was found that existing monitoring and evaluation was inconsistent in preva
lence and scope. Those involved in short courses were in favour of a more c
onsistent and visible evaluation, including some assessment of impact-on-pr
actice and cost-effectiveness. In conclusion, meaningful evaluation needs t
o include four key processes: data gathering; data analysis; dissemination
and, action planning (reviewing provision in the light of the data analysis
). Thus, this evaluation framework feeds into a quality development cycle d
esigned to ensure high quality and relevant short course provision for gene
ral dental practitioners.