Ea. Laude et al., The effect of antihistamine, endothelin antagonist and corticosteroid prophylaxis on contrast media induced bronchospasm, BR J RADIOL, 72(863), 1999, pp. 1058-1063
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Bronchospasm is a well recognized adverse reaction to radiographic contrast
media (RCM) and may occur more frequently in asthmatics and atopics. This
study was designed to identify RCM which are most likely to cause bronchosp
asm and to investigate underlying mechanisms mediating this response. Guine
a pigs (mean body weight 550 g, n=46) were anaesthetized with Hypnorm (5 mi
kg(-1)) and Hypnovel (2 mi kg(-1)) and tracheal, jugular and pleural cannu
lae introduced. Total airways resistance (Raw) was calculated from the slop
e of the pressure/flow relationship. The effects of RCM (diatrizoate 370 mg
I ml(-1), ioxaglate 320 mgI ml(-1), iotrolan 300 mgI ml(-1) and iopromide 3
00 mgI ml(-1)) at a dose of 4 mi kg(-1) body weight or control solutions ma
tched for volume, pH and osmolarity administered via the jugular vein on Ra
w were studied. The effects of pre-treatment (30 min before the administrat
ion of RCM) with antihistamine (Mepyramine (30 mg kg(-1)ip)) or non-selecti
ve endothelin receptor antagonist (SB209670 (1 mg kg(-1)iv)) were investiga
ted. The effectiveness of corticosteroids prophylaxis (prednisolone (20 mg
kg(-1)ip)) administered 18-24 h and 1 h pre-RCM was also assessed. Control
animals received normal saline pre-treatment before RCM administration. Lun
gs were taken for histological examination 30-40 min post-administration of
RCM. Only ioxaglate caused a significant (p<0.05) increase in Raw (5.19+/-
0.58 to 13.95+/-3.53 mmHg ml(-1) min(-1)). Neither mannitol nor saline cont
rol solutions had any effect on Raw. Pre-treatment with Mepyramine, SB20967
0 or prednisolone caused no significant change in the ioxaglate induced inc
rease in Raw. Histological examination of lung tissue from ioxaglate treate
d animals showed no important abnormalities. In summary, only the ionic dim
er ioxaglate caused an increase in Raw. This effect was independent of osmo
larity and could be the result of the chemical composition of the contrast
agent. It was not an inflammatory response and could not be prevented by pr
ophylactic treatment with antihistamine, endothelin antagonist or corticost
eroids. The mechanisms responsible for the increase in Raw remain uncertain
.