Duplex ultrasonography in assessing restenosis of renal artery stents

Citation
J. Bakker et al., Duplex ultrasonography in assessing restenosis of renal artery stents, CARDIO IN R, 22(6), 1999, pp. 475-480
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01741551 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
475 - 480
Database
ISI
SICI code
0174-1551(199911/12)22:6<475:DUIARO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the accuracy and optimal threshold values of duplex u ltrasonography (US) in assessing restenosis of renal artery stents. Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients with 33 renal arteries that had p reviously been treated with placement of a Palmaz stent underwent duplex US prior to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which was th e reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent peak systolic velocit y (PSV) and reno-aortic ratio (RAR = PSV renal stent/PSV aorta) in detectin g > 50% in-stent restenosis were evaluated by the receiver operating charac teristic curve. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using the optim al threshold values, and using published threshold values: RAR > 3.5 and in -stent PSV > 180 cm/sec. Results: Six examinations were technically inadequate. Nine stents had resi dual or restenosis > 50% at DSA. The two duplex parameters were equally acc urate since areas under the curves were similar (0.943). With optimal thres hold values of 226 cm/sec for PSV and 2.7 for RAR, sensitivities and specif icities were 100% and 90%, and 100% and 84%, respectively. Using the publis hed duplex criteria resulted in sensitivities and specificities of 100% and 74% for PSV, and 50% and 89% for RAR. Conclusion: Duplex US is a sensitive modality for detecting in-stent resten osis if laboratory-specific threshold values are used.