Until recently, pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric injection of botu
linum toxin (Botox) have been used as initial treatments for achalasia, wit
h myotomy reserved for patients with residual dysphagia. It is unknown, how
ever, whether these nonsurgical treatments affect the performance of a subs
equent myotomy. We compared the results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and
Dor fundoplication in 44 patients with achalasia who had been treated with
medications (group A, 16 patients), pneumatic dilatation (group B, 18 patie
nts), or botulinum toxin (group C, 10 patients). The last group was further
subdivided according to whether there was (C2, 4 patients) or was not (C1,
6 patients) a response to the treatment. Results for groups A, B, CI, and
C2, respectively, were: anatomic planes identified at surgery (% of patient
s)-100%, 89%, 100%, and 25%; esophageal perforation (% of patients)-0%, 5%,
0%, and 50%; hospital stay (hrs)-26 +/- 8, 38 +/- 25, 26 +/- 11, and 72 +/
- 65; and excellent/good results (% of patients)-87%, 95%; 100%, and 50%. T
hese results show that: (1) previous pneumatic dilatation did not affect th
e results of myotomy; (2) in patients who did not respond to botulinum toxi
n, the myotomy was technically straightforward and the outcome was excellen
t; (3) in patients who responded to botulinum toxin, the LES muscle had bec
ome fibrotic (perforation occurred more often in this setting, and dysphagi
a was less predictably improved); and (4) myotomy relieved dysphagia in 91%
of patients who bad not been treated with botulinum toxin. These data supp
ort a strategy of reserving botulinum toxin for patients who are not candid
ates for pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic Heller myotomy.