The problem of managing for sustainability is marked by the need to make de
cisions on behalf of others and by the uncertainties that attend such decis
ions. However, the economic literature on sustainability has paid scant att
ention to how decisions on behalf of others might differ from decisions on
behalf of oneself. And, when risk has been modeled explicitly, the expected
utility hypothesis has generally been used: a generation acts sustainably
if the expected value of the next generation's utility is not less than the
present's. This paper investigates how we think about responsibly acting o
n another's behalf by looking to the United States law of trusts because in
important respects the current generation views its responsibility to the
future as a trust relationship. Trust law illuminates responsible decision
making under both risk and uncertainty. Even under conditions of risk more
conservative action than would be suggested by the expected utility hypothe
sis is warranted. Because it emphasizes preservation of trust principal and
disavows profit maximization, trust doctrine indicates that special cautio
n should be exercised in conditions of uncertainty. Finally, resource econo
mic concepts of strong sustainability, the precautionary principle, and the
safe minimum standard of conservation are interpreted according to trust p
rinciples. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.