The purpose of this paper is to analyse and compare the values of a margina
l change in the area of land as a pollutant sink under different decision-m
aking contexts and objectives: international coordination versus national p
olicies for pollutant reduction, and maximization of net benefits versus mi
nimization of costs for pollutant reductions. The analytical results show t
hat a coordinated policy between countries generates a higher value of a ma
rginal change in the supply of land as a pollutant sink than an uncoordinat
ed policy. It is also shown that the value is lower (higher) under the deci
sion objective of maximizing net benefits when the efficient pollutant load
is higher (lower) than the load target under the cost effectiveness approa
ch. An application to the Baltic Sea drainage basin land as a nitrogen sink
for the management of eutrophication reveals that the differences between
values under different policy contexts and objectives can be quite large in
magnitude. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.