M. Soliva et A. Widmer, Genetic and floral divergence among sympatric populations of Gymnadenia conopsea SL (orchideaceae) with different flowering phenology, INT J PL SC, 160(5), 1999, pp. 897-905
Gymnadenia conopsea s.l. is a common orchid in central Europe, where early-
and late-flowering populations can be distinguished. The early-flowering f
orm is recognized as subspecies conopsea and the late-flowering form as sub
species densiflora. The two subspecies can occur in sympatry, but their flo
wering periods are separated. We investigated whether early- and late-flowe
ring subspecies are genetically differentiated, whether they diverged once
or repeatedly, and we tried to identify potential evolutionary forces invol
ved in the divergence of the two subspecies. We used genetic markers to est
imate genetic divergence within and among populations of early- and late-fl
owering G. conopsea, and to reconstruct their evolutionary history. In addi
tion, we assessed morphological variation between subspecies. Allozyme vari
ation indicated that subspecies conopsea was significantly more variable th
an ssp. densiflora a and that gene flow among populations of ssp. conopsea
was higher than among populations of ssp, densiflora. Gene flow between sub
species was low, indicating that the difference in flowering phenology repr
esented an effective barrier to gene flow. A neighbor-joining tree based on
allozyme frequencies indicated that early- and late- flowering populations
did not diverge repeatedly in sympatry. Levels of cpDNA variation were gen
erally low, even between G. conopsea s.l. and Gymnadenia odoratissima, chos
en as an outgroup. Four cpDNA haplotypes were found, which differed only in
the number of microsatellite repeats. Their distribution among subspecies
of G. conopsea s.l. and G. odoratissima indicates that microsatellite haplo
types have evolved repeatedly, and their occurrence in different taxa thus
represents a homoplasy. Floral characters were variable within and among po
pulations and subspecies but did not consistently separate early- from late
-flowering populations. A weak separation between subspecies was found in v
egetative characters that presumably reflected habitat and competitive diff
erences experienced by early- and late-flowering populations.