Partial protection against oral challenge with Mycobacterium bovis in ferrets (Mustela furo) following oral vaccination with BCG

Citation
T. Qureshi et al., Partial protection against oral challenge with Mycobacterium bovis in ferrets (Mustela furo) following oral vaccination with BCG, INT J TUBE, 3(11), 1999, pp. 1025-1033
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE
ISSN journal
10273719 → ACNP
Volume
3
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1025 - 1033
Database
ISI
SICI code
1027-3719(199911)3:11<1025:PPAOCW>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
SETTING: Ferrets (Mustela: furo) are important wildlife vectors of bovine t uberculosis (TB) in New Zealand. Protective vaccination of ferrets may limi t the potential of transmission to livestock. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether orally-delivered Mycobacterium bovis BCG ca n confer protection against oral challenge with virulent M. bovis. DESIGN: Ten ferrets were vaccinated by feeding measured doses of live BCG, and subsequently challenged with virulent M. bovis via the oral route. Ten non-vaccinated (control) ferrets were similarly challenged. Live body weigh ts and lymphocyte reactivity were monitored longitudinally, and ferrets wer e killed 20 weeks following challenge. Necropsy, histological examination a nd bacterial culture of alimentary tract lymphatic tissues were undertaken. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the incidence of gross tuberc ulous lesions among vaccinated ferrets compared to control animals, and few er vaccinated ferrets had histologically-detectable acid-fast organisms in mesenteric lymph node (LN) tissues. There were significantly fewer vaccinat ed ferrets with culture-positive retropharyngeal LNs, and the mean bacteria l burden was significantly lower for retropharyngeal LNs isolated from vacc inated animals than from controls. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that oral BCG vaccination of ferrets can confer partial protection against M. bovis, and suggest that systemic i mmune responses may be less important in mediating this degree of protectio n than local immunity.