Objectives: The purpose of this descriptive study was to provide updated da
ta on the teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in
Europe as part of a survey of this aspect of the primary dental curriculum
in Europe and North America.
Methods: Data on the teaching of posterior composite restorations and relat
ed matters were collected by means of a postal questionnaire sent to 185 de
ntal schools known to exist in Europe. Non-respondents were sent a second q
uestionnaire after two months. Further information pertaining to student re
quirements was sought after six months from all respondents.
Results: The response ranged from 92% for dental schools in Scandinavia to
40% from dental schools in Southern Europe with an overall response of 56%.
All but four of the 104 participating schools were found to teach the use
of composites in Class I and Class II, two-surface situations in at least p
remolar teeth. Contraindications and techniques taught for posterior compos
ites varied within and between the country groupings of Northern and Centra
l Europe, Scandinavia, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe. However, certain
consensus views were identified. The experience of adverse biological reac
tions to the use of resin-based restoratives in European dental schools was
found to be limited.
Conclusions: Notwithstanding the variation in the response from the four ge
ographic regions investigated and the relatively low overall response to th
e questionnaire, it is concluded that the data reported indicates that most
dental schools in Europe teach the use of composites in selected Class I a
nd Class II situations. However, considerable variation exists both within
and between the regions investigated in relation to this teaching. Further
research and consensus conferences should be planned to reduce variability
across Europe in relation to the contraindications and techniques taught fo
r posterior composites. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.